I’m planning a trip to Europe for late September / early October. When I plan trips, I usually just try to book flights and lodging ahead of time, and plan daily activities much closer to the actual trip. Most of the time, I have a loose idea of what I want to do (and that usually takes up less than a day), and then just walk around and let serendipity take care of the rest.
However, earlier trips I’ve planned have been easier than planning this Europe trip. With other trips, I usually only have 7 – 10 days to travel because of how much PTO I can take. In that amount of time, I usually stick to 1 city, with some day or overnight trips, or 2 locations that are close by. Anything more feels more rushed.
I don’t have that same constraint with this trip, since I’m not working and thus don’t need to be back on a particular day. It’s also easier to do multiple cities on trips to Europe. You can generally hit a new city every 3 – 5 days since they’re so close together.
Besides London, there’s no other place that’s “on my bucket list” so to speak, so I can’t use that to narrow down my options. With the relative lack of constraints, there are hundreds of different itineraries that I could build.
I’ve researched travel destinations and recommendations for where to go, but I haven’t seen many people sit down and write out their thought process for how they arrived at a particular travel arrangement. I thought it would be fun to do so, and I’m hoping that other people can benefit from seeing my decision process explicitly laid out.